COFES
The Congress on the Future of Engineering Software Register | Login
COFES 2009
April 16-19, 2009
Scottsdale, Arizona
The Scottsdale Plaza Resort
 Search
Is there a future for the Engineering Profession
Location: BlogsBrian Seitz    
Posted by: Brian Seitz 1/27/2007 9:43 AM

The signs that the engineering profession, like medicine, is in flux are all around.  As Engineering S/W becomes more "intelligent" design democratization become more possible and probable. Does this spell the end of engineering as a profession, a transition to a new model of work, or potentially a redefinition of engineering?

 

A long time ago Engineering was considered a highly qualified and respected profession. The profession and the disciplines under that profession (civil, mechanical, Electrical, Chemical, Hydraulic, etc.) were, like medical professions, considered both a calling into a community of practice as well a requiring their own codes of honor.  A new engineering candidate was not simply tutored in the academic of the profession s/he was apprenticed and grown through experience into a master craftsman.

 

I use the work craftsman deliberately in that too many engineering projects now are no longer works of a craftsman engineer, they are becoming more spreadsheet optimizations that expressions of a creative and innovative mind.  Maybe this is the result of outsourcing, global competition, or maybe our culture’s obsession with the bottom line.  The values that the engineering community once cherished seem to be wearing away with time; with it customer loyalty has been replaced with consumer preferences and choice.  In response many design firms have created their own nightmares of massive product lines, only to have to scale back under the weight of too few customers for each variation.

 

The latest trend and potential threat to the engineering community is that of “democratization of design” made popular by Eric von Hipple of MIT.  The premise of such is to develop systems that enable potential customers to design their own products.  If we extend this metaphor further in the future could this mean engineers are to become a thing of the past?  Maybe the engineering profession becomes more of a facilitation role like architects now on all but the most independent profile projects. 

 

If this is the case, should engineers now prepare to become technical facilitators and develop those soft people skills we’re suppose to lack or should we look at what we are doing with the current engineering software and realize there is more to good design that just balancing the stress and functional formulas; there is an element of creativity and style with differentiates a mass production design and product stamped out by the thousands ending up as a Walmart special and a premium product that lasts. 

 

Maybe that is the new reality…mass customization…experience economy where momentary novelty replaces individual style for all but the very few.  

Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (6)   Add Comment
Re: Is there a future for the Engineering Profession    By wbh on 1/27/2007 12:46 PM
I'm sure I speak for most architects when I object to your characterization of architects as just performing the role of facilitation.

While the role of facilitation is important and invaluable to our clients, to say that the role of the architect has essentially devolved into just that of a facilitator besmirches and belittles the real practice of architecture.

Re: Is there a future for the Engineering Profession    By Brian Seitz on 1/27/2007 2:43 PM
If my statement offends, my appology. However, I stand by my comment and further state it proudly; Perhasp my view of facilatation is different than yours in that facilitation of a client's desire for a home that truly meets their needs, style and budget is a much higher calling than modding the last design for the fifthteenth time so a developer can produce a thirty+ development of cookie cutter houses.

It takes real effort to pull out of a person what's in their head, more to represent it back to them in a manner they can understand, and even more to balance the cost/benefit to make it possible, and still more to ensure it was made, as the client desired.

I do not believe facilitator belittles the role of architect, but rather enhances it to that of a true customer-centric professional. It requires more creativity than mearly calculating scaling up or down, it puts problem solving inn the context of serving the customer in addition to serving the physics of the materials.

Re: Is there a future for the Engineering Profession    By dksmith on 1/29/2007 3:35 AM
As an architect I see we are at a significant cross roads with building information models. Either we step up and accept that we are going to need to provide information in a format that will be acceptable to all others in the facility lifecycle, especially the facility manager or we allow the owner/facility manager to hire us and dictate how we will perfom and what information is provided. Either lead or roll over... Hence we could also loose even the roll of facilitator...

Re: Is there a future for the Engineering Profession    By Brian K Seitz on 1/29/2007 9:14 AM
As an former Architect (AEC industry vs S/W), then S/W Architect, and now Enterprise Architect I find the issues the same in each discipline. We as a design community have been focused upon the physics in our respective fields and forgetting the pragmatics that the field was based upon. Maybe that is due to the education now that is very much focused upon the physics and mathematics of our discipline and the drop off of the other soft skills that enable use to interact effectively with other people. I remember how intimate my connection to a client was when I started out. I worked as a conceptual designer in a small specialized firm. My role was to interview the client as to lifestyle, workflow patterns, and appearance style perferences. Once I had a preliminary client profile I would sketch up several test concepts and present them to the client with my boss to zero in on where the client really wanted to go in their mind.

I thought initially that it was a gopher position originally, I was iching to get on the board and "really design". It was only later that my boss and mentor showed me through these assignments and experience that the real design took place through these client interaction, and that he view his job working with clients --like Michaelangio working with stone-- was to get the building that was in the clients mind out onto paper so it could be built. If that wasn't facilatation I don't know what it is.

Now as the amount of stakeholders increases and specializes in construction projects the role of facilatator has increased in importance. The tasks of project management, communincator, mediator, problem solver and the like have increased as the information about the project( constructed product, process to construct, operate & maintain, environmental factors, etc..) grows exponetially. A resources become scarce this only increases the issues more. Failure to address them puts a designer's future at risk.

Re: Is there a future for the Engineering Profession    By John Callen on 2/28/2007 12:39 PM
I think we may be tripping over terminology here - I believe "facilitation" is a key role of architect (having been educated/trained as one, but not a practicing architect). But I also believe that "distillation" - extracting the essence of a client's desires/whims/needs/personna into a requirements/specification is a key and definitely separate role from facilitation.

I also don't see the role of the designer being something that is just going to evaporate, either, even with highly democratized design. At the extremes Design can be for the masses or for the unique. Even coming up with a highly customizable system will require someone to design this, moving Design's focus from "objects" to canonical elements and frameworks - the vernacular that customization occurs within.

All in all, I think this is an extremely exciting time for Design and designers.

Re: Is there a future for the Engineering Profession    By Dick Morley on 2/28/2007 12:39 PM
Yes, but not as now known
Consumer limited markets will define products and services, not technology
Good luck'


Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 
COFES Blog Search
Copyright 2008 by Cyon Research Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy
Site Credits